The AgendaManager: Evaluation Scenario
The AgendaManager: Evaluation Scenario |
|
| Synopsis: | This page describes a scenario used in the evaluation of the AgendaManager. | ||
| Keywords: | Cockpit Task Management, CTM, distributed artificial intelligence, Agenda Management, AgendaManager, evaluation, scenario. | ||
| Author: | Ken Funk | <funkk@engr.orst.edu> | Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA |
| Last Update: | 3 June 1999 | ||
Below is a map of one of the two scenarios used in comparing the AgendaManager to a model of EICAS. This scenario involves a departure from Portland, Oregon (PDX) and a short flight to Eugene, Oregon (EUG). The airports are represented by rectangles, the waypoints (navigation fixes) are represented by triangles and the legs of the flight path are represented by line between those symbols. The dashed line between UBG and CVO is a leg from the original flight plan, which had to be changed enroute in response to an ATC re-route clearance. Click your mouse on the dashed rectangle around either airport to see a more detailed map.
In the scenario, the experimenter gave clearances (as ATC controller) and introduced subsystem faults. Several of these events are shown on the map. Each one is represented by an arrow and a designator of the form 'FLT x' where x is a letter. Keep in mind that in a given simulator run, the subject would see either the AMgr or EICAS, not both, depending on the display condition of the experiment.
